Q: Going back to the Khilafat Movement, I
am finding that however strange and absurd it may have seemed in
its goals, it was still a very popular movement.
Yes, certainly. I remember as a boy, I was twelve years old, and
there were songs in Punjabi that I even remember sung in the streets
of Lahore. I remember a delegation of Turks passing through Lahore
on their way to Afghanistan. In those days there were no aeroplanes,
so they landed in Bombay and came by train. Maulana Zafar Ali Khan,
who was then the editor of the Zamindar and a great political figure,
also a very learned man and very fine person, he wrote article after
article that the Turks were coming. I remember posters put on by
the Zamindar quoting [the Urdu poet] Ghalib. I was then in college
and we as students went to the railway station to receive these
Turks. Being young we were strong and we managed to be right in
front. When the train steamed in, the people in the back started
pushing and we were yelling at the top of our voice for we would
have been thrown in front of the engine. We just stopped. I remember
some of the leaders going to meet these Turks, [Sir Mohammed] Iqbal
was there I think. But I was rather disappointed you see, for I
thought, being Turks that they would be wearing headcaps and all
that, but they looked just like ordinary Europeans. I was not very
much impressed.
But this was a genuine feeling [and was reflected in the local
press]. Lahore was a center of Urdu publication. You will be surprised
to hear that there were three Urdu newspapers of Lahore, which were
owned by Hindus: Partab, Mehrab, and Vi Bharat. All three were Hindu
newspapers. They probably still come out in Amballa. Many famous
magazines came out from Lahore. This was the cultural center for
the whole of India.
Q: I have seen a piece of film of [Khilafat
leader] Mohammed Ali film footage visiting Lahore in the early twenties
-
I was there. It was about 1920. I will tell you a story. I think
it was 1920 or 1921, somewhere about there. In those days there
were very few cars in Lahore. I think no more than about ten. We
had one. My cousin and I were getting some harmonium lessons, and
when we went to get a harmonium, somebody told us that the Ali brothers
were coming. So we decided that we should go to the railway station
and see the Ali brothers. As it happened when we reached the railway
station and stopped the car, the Ali brothers came out and there
were people following them. The only car there was ours. So they
brought them towards this car and we couldn't say no. So they sat
down. With them was Maulana Abdul Bari, also a leader. They had
been jailed together, the three of them and come out together. So
I sat on the harmonium and these three gentlemen sat in the back.
I remember when we went through the bazaar, people asked them to
stand up, so they stood up. We used to live near Branner Hall, near
the central railway college where they spoke that night.
Q: What did you think of Mohammed Ali? What
kind of a man was he?
I'm afraid I didn't know Mohammed Ali. I was told he was a great
scholar, having started this newspaper [The Comrade] and he wrote
English very well. Shaukat Ali was just a kind of reflection of
him, he did not have much in him except that he was really just
a fine figure of a man. It was the reflected glory of Mohammed Ali
which came to Shaukat Ali.
They played an important role in the Congress, there is no doubt
about that. I remember clearly, I was in the first year or second
year [of college] when they were imprisoned in Chinwara jail in
the Central provinces and Mohammed Ali was elected as President
of the Indian National Congress in Kokannada in the south of India.
I liked Urdu poetry very much. He started his address - they were
in prison for about four years, and he went straight from prison
to Kokannada to make his Presidential address to the Congress. He
started with a famous Urdu verse which was absolutely apt and that
meant that the turn of the goblet was as long as a century and the
moment that I came out of the tavern, I saw that the world had changed.
This is what he said. His English was very fluent, but I missed
him because unfortunately I didn't attend the first Round Table
Conference in 1930. I didn't go to Europe till 1931. He was a member
of the Round Table in 1930, Shaukat Ali was there in 1931 when I
was there. But he [Mohammed Ali] was a personality. But unfortunately
all these people were lost in the Khilafat Movement, completely,
because they supported a cause which Gandhi saw [as limited] but
which they did not. It was more emotional than hard thinking. Quaid,
for instance, never paid any attention to the Khilafat Movement
because he had a much clearer sense that it was futile.